In the world of mathematics, many strange consequences are possible if the rules are changed.But there is also a rule that most of us have been warned not to break: Do not divide by zero.
How can the esay combination of a daily using number and a basic operation cause such problems? Generally, dividing by smaller and smaller numbers gives you bigger and bigger answers.
• Ten divided by two is divided into five, one ten, one million divided by ten million and so on. So it seems that if you divide by numbers that keep shrinking all the way down to zero, the answer will be the greatest thing possible.
• Then, isn’t 10 really the answer divide by zero by infinity? This may sound plausible. But we all really know that if we divide 10 by a number that tilts to zero, the answer leads to infinity.
And it is not the same thing to say that 10 divide by zero is equal to infinity. Why not? Okay, let’s take a look at what division actually means.
• Ten divided by two can mean, “How many times do we have to add two together to make 10,” or, “Does twice equal 10?”
Dividing by a number is essentially the reverse of multiplying by it, in the following way: If we multiply a number by a given number x, we can ask if there is a new number that we can later Can be multiplied to begin.
If there is, the new number is called the multiplier inverse of x. For example, if you multiply two to three to get six, you can multiply by one-half to get back three.
So the inverse multiplication of two is one-half, and the inverse multiplication of 10 is one-tenth. As you can see, the multiplication of any number and its inverse multiplication are always one.
If we want to divide by zero, we need to find its multiplicative inverse, which must be greater than zero. This would be a number that multiplied it by zero to give it one.
But because anything multiplied by zero is zero, such a number is impossible, so there is no inverse multiplier of zero.
Does this really settle things, though? After all, mathematicians have broken the first rules. For an example, for a long term, there was no such thing that taking the square root of negative numbers.
But then mathematicians defined the square root of the negative as a new number, called I, opening up a whole new mathematical world of complex numbers.
So if they can do this, can’t we just make a new rule, say, the symbol infinite means more than zero, and see what happens?
Let us try that we already know nothing about infinity. Based on the definition of a multiplication inverse, zero times infinity must equal one.
This means that zero times infinity and zero times infinity must be two equal. Now, by the distributive property, the left side of the equation can be rearranged from zero to zero times infinity.
And since zero plus zero is definitely zero, that reduces from zero to infinite times. Unfortunately, we have already defined it equal to one, while the other side of the equation is still equating it to two. So, one is equal to two.
Oddly enough, this is not wrong; This is not true in our ordinary world of numbers. If one, two and every other number were equal to zero, it can still be mathematically valid in a way.
But having infinity equal to zero is ultimately not useful to mathematicians, or anyone else. There is actually something called the Riman region that involves dividing zeros by a different method, but this is a story for another day.
Meanwhile, divide by zero in the most obvious way does not work very well. But we should not stop living dangerously and break mathematical rules to see if we can invent to explore a fun, new world.
So, guys these are the reasons why we can’t divide by zero, greatly i hope you find this article useful If you love this article, then give me your feedback, and don’t forget to share this article. please SUBSCRIBE the Healthy Way Of live site for more informational articles as well. Thank you very much for reading this article.
© Copyright 2020 – 2021
For any feedback on this website contact us- [email protected]
Frequently Asked Questions